The Unfolding Crisis in Darfur
In April 2023, what started as fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces has rapidly escalated into a deadly civil war across Sudan. Over 16 months, the extreme violence and restrictions on humanitarian aid have led to a catastrophic situation – the worst internal displacement crisis in the world, combined with widespread acute food insecurity.
The crisis has reached a devastating new low with the confirmation of famine conditions in the Zamzam internally displaced persons (IDP) camp, located in Sudan’s North Darfur region. According to the Famine Review Committee (FRC), a team of UN-supported food security and nutrition experts, the thresholds for famine have been met or surpassed in Zamzam – at least 20% of households are experiencing extreme lack of food, 30% of children are suffering from acute malnutrition, and there is a malnutrition-related death rate of at least 2 people or 4 children per 10,000 per day.
While the Sudanese government has refused to formally declare famine, the FRC’s judgment is clear – famine is now a reality in parts of Darfur. And the situation may be even more dire, as the FRC has also determined that famine is likely ongoing in two other nearby IDP camps, Abu Shouk and Al Salam. Tragically, this is just the beginning, as the FRC does not rule out the possibility that famine is present across other regions of Sudan, with at least 13 areas at risk.
Drivers of the Famine Crisis
So how did Sudan reach this devastating point? The primary drivers are clear – conflict and a near-total lack of humanitarian access.
The civil war that began in Khartoum has spread rapidly across the country, leaving nearly 19,000 people killed and 33,000 injured as of July 2024. This extreme violence, combined with the Sudanese government’s intentional blocking of aid delivery into the Darfur region for months, has had catastrophic consequences.
Prior to the recent reopening of the Adré border crossing (the main access point into Darfur), just a single delivery of food assistance had reached the Zamzam IDP camp in 2024 – an amount sufficient for less than 5% of the camp’s population. With the Zamzam camp estimated to shelter between 500,000 to 800,000 displaced people (double its size from April 2024), the lack of aid has been utterly devastating.
Adding to the crisis, Sudan is facing an unprecedented displacement emergency, with the conflict forcing millions to flee their homes. This influx of displaced people puts extreme pressure on already scarce resources, threatening to destabilize the entire region. The conflict has also pushed the banking sector into severe crisis, leading to widespread cash shortages and soaring inflation – staple grain prices are expected to rise 200% above last year’s levels.
Global Monitoring and Famine Determination
The process of confirming famine is a technical one, carried out by groups like the FRC and the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system. To be classified as famine (IPC Phase 5), three key thresholds must be met or exceeded at a regional level:
- At least 20% of households experience an extreme lack of food.
- At least 30% of children suffer from acute malnutrition.
- There is a malnutrition-related death rate of at least 2 people or 4 children per 10,000 per day.
In the case of Zamzam, the FRC was able to affirm the likelihood of famine despite limited recent quantitative data, considering worsening local conditions and historical patterns of food insecurity in the region. Earlier assessments by organizations like Médecins Sans Frontières had already suggested the famine threshold for child malnutrition may have been surpassed as early as January 2024.
It’s important to note that the FRC’s confirmation of famine in Zamzam is not an official UN declaration. Such declarations require action by the Sudanese government or an independent international body, which has not occurred despite the dire circumstances. This highlights a key limitation of the famine declaration system – governments can resist or delay the process, hindering the delivery of life-saving aid.
The Consequences and Global Response
The impacts of this famine are devastating. Based on observed trends in humanitarian access and assessments of energy intake deficits, excess mortality in Sudan could reach 2.5 million by the end of September 2024. And the suffering extends far beyond Zamzam – over 25.6 million people across Sudan are facing acute hunger, with 13 regions at risk of famine in the coming months.
Yet the global response has been woefully inadequate. Funding for the 2024 Humanitarian Response Plan in Sudan remains only 41% fulfilled, leaving a gap of almost $1.6 billion. And while the reopening of the Adré border crossing two weeks after the FRC’s famine confirmation suggests some progress, aid groups still question what restrictions the Sudanese authorities will impose.
Between August 20-30, a mere 59 aid trucks carrying enough supplies for about 195,000 people have been able to enter Sudan through the crossing from Chad. This painfully slow trickle of assistance is nowhere near enough to address the scale of the crisis.
The international community must act with urgency to prevent further catastrophe. As Kitchen Warrior has emphasized, famine declarations alone are not enough – sustained attention and action is required long after the warning signs appear. The global food security monitoring systems like FEWS NET and the IPC exist to prevent such emergencies, and it is the responsibility of governments, aid agencies, and organizations to prioritize preventative measures before the next famine emerges.
The Path Forward: Expanding Global Food Security Efforts
While the situation in Sudan’s Darfur region is dire, there are steps the global community can take to address this crisis and strengthen food security more broadly:
-
Increase Funding and Access for Humanitarian Aid: Donors must urgently fulfill funding gaps for relief efforts in Sudan and expand humanitarian access to reach those in greatest need. Removing bureaucratic barriers and facilitating the free flow of aid is critical.
-
Enhance Early Warning and Preventative Action: Global food security monitoring systems must be empowered to act on early warning signs, triggering rapid response before famine conditions materialize. Investing in disaster preparedness can save countless lives.
-
Support Sustainable Food Systems: Beyond emergency relief, the international community should focus on building resilient and sustainable food systems that can withstand shocks. This includes supporting smallholder farmers, improving market access, and addressing the root causes of hunger.
-
Prioritize Conflict Resolution: Conflicts are a primary driver of food insecurity and famine. Diplomatic efforts to end hostilities and restore peace must be a top priority, enabling the delivery of aid and the restoration of local food production.
-
Leverage Technology and Innovation: New technologies and innovative approaches can revolutionize global food security efforts, from supply chain optimization to digital early warning systems. Scaling impactful innovations should be a key part of the solution.
As an experienced culinary professional, Kitchen Warrior understands the critical importance of food security on a global scale. While the situation in Sudan’s Darfur is bleak, hope remains if the international community comes together to address this crisis with the urgency it deserves. By taking decisive action, we can prevent further devastation and move closer to a world with zero hunger.
Key Takeaways
- Famine has been confirmed in the Zamzam IDP camp in Sudan’s North Darfur region, with the potential for famine conditions in at least 13 other areas of the country.
- Conflict, displacement, and lack of humanitarian access are the primary drivers of this crisis, with the Sudanese government accused of intentionally blocking aid delivery.
- The process of famine determination is technical, but governments can resist or delay official declarations, hindering the delivery of life-saving assistance.
- The global response has been inadequate, with funding gaps and continued restrictions on aid access. Urgent action is needed to prevent further catastrophe.
- Preventative measures, sustainable food systems, conflict resolution, and innovative solutions are critical to address this crisis and strengthen global food security.
